“Doitify vs Teamhood: Which Is Better in 2026?”

What does Teamhood do differently from a generic board?

Doitify vs Teamhood is a key topic in modern project management and teamwork. Most project tools treat Kanban as a view: the same task list, rearranged into columns. Teamhood treats the board as the system.

The distinction shows up in three features. WIP limits can be enforced per column, so a card cannot enter “In review” when the review column is full — the constraint becomes visible instead of becoming a bottleneck nobody names. Swimlanes let one board carry several concurrent flows, which is how real delivery works: urgent fixes, planned features, and client requests share a team but not a priority order. Capacity planning shows assigned effort per person per period, tied to the same cards, so the board and the resourcing conversation use one dataset.

Add timesheets and a Gantt view and you have a coherent product for a team that ships continuously and bills for it. That is a narrower scope than the major platforms and a deeper one than most of them on this specific job.

How does pricing compare in 2026?

Teamhood’s current pricing page sells a single plan rather than a tier ladder, which is unusual and mostly a good thing. Prices below were checked in November 2026, excluding tax.

The single-plan model is worth pausing on, because it changes the buying conversation. With Teamhood you are not choosing which features you deserve; you are choosing how many people need a seat. That removes the most common upgrade trap — buying the mid tier for one reporting feature — and it also means there is no cheaper tier to step down to if the team shrinks.

The Doitify model runs the other way: you build the package from members, storage, reminders, SMS, pro email, and AI credits. It rewards a team that knows its own shape and punishes a team that guesses high on storage it will never use.

What does a 15-person team pay over three years?

Fifteen people, all needing edit access, is a realistic agency delivery team. Here is the arithmetic.

Teamhood, annual billing: 15 × €11 = €165 per month, so €1,980 per year. Over three years, €5,940.

Teamhood, monthly billing: 15 × €14 = €210 per month, or €2,520 per year. That is €540 more than annual, a 27% premium, which is roughly what you pay for the right to leave in a bad quarter.

Doitify: the free board covers 5 members; the remaining seats move you into package pricing, which is quoted per member and storage block rather than per feature. The comparison a buyer should make is not the seat price against €11, but the total: if Teamhood plus a separate document tool plus a separate reporting export costs more than one package, the package wins without any per-seat discount.

One more line that belongs in this calculation and usually is not: currency. If your revenue is in dollars or rials and your Teamhood invoice is in euros, a 5% currency move on a €5,940 three-year commitment is €297 — not fatal, but it belongs in the model if finance is watching.

Where does Doitify win?

Doitify is our product, so read this as disclosure. The fair claims are specific ones.

One record, many views. A task with an owner, a status, a checklist, and due dates appears as a Kanban card, a Gantt bar, a roadmap item, and a calendar entry, and it rolls into work and performance reports. Teamhood also connects boards to Gantt and capacity, but Doitify extends the same record to documents, meetings, and goal tracking — which is where teams otherwise start exporting.

Dependencies as a first-class object. A blocked task shows as blocked and pushes the schedule. On a pure Kanban board, dependencies are a convention written in a card description, and conventions decay.

Client-facing reporting. If you send a monthly progress report to a client, the report is a view rather than a spreadsheet you assemble. For agencies billing retainers, that is the feature that pays for the tool.

Price shape at small scale. A permanent free board with up to 5 members and 5 MB of storage means a three-person studio starts at zero and upgrades when a sixth person joins, rather than at a 3-seat minimum.

RTL and bilingual teams. Doitify ships modern UI with RTL support, which matters for teams that write in both directions daily.

The honest limitation is equally specific: if your team’s culture is a strict Kanban flow with enforced WIP limits per column, Doitify’s board will feel less opinionated than Teamhood’s, because it is designed to serve several methodologies rather than one.

Where does Teamhood win?

Flow discipline. Enforced WIP limits and swimlanes are not features you can approximate with tags. A team that has adopted flow-based delivery will find Teamhood’s board closer to their process than almost anything else at this price.

One plan, no feature ladder. Everything Teamhood sells — capacity planning, Gantt, timesheets, API — is in the €11 plan. There is no “reporting is Business only” moment in month four.

Timesheets tied to cards. For a services team, time capture that lives on the same card as the work is the difference between billing 85% of hours and billing 70%. More on that below.

A small, focused product. Teamhood does one thing and does not try to be a CRM, a wiki, and a chat app. Teams that are tired of platforms shipping features they never asked for find that restraint attractive.

Ecosystem familiarity. If your team already works in a Kanban tool and likes it, the switch to Teamhood is the shortest move in this category. The switching cost is a week, not a quarter.

What are Teamhood’s honest limits?

Three, and they matter at different team sizes.

Ecosystem breadth. Teamhood is a smaller vendor with a smaller integration catalogue than monday.com or Asana. If your stack depends on native two-way sync with a specific finance or HR system, verify that integration exists before you standardise, and ask whether it is native or a Zapier bridge. “Integrates with” covers both.

Procurement footprint. A 60-person organisation with a security review will ask for attestations, a data processing agreement, and a named account contact. A smaller European vendor may well provide all three — but it publishes less publicly than the US majors, so the review takes longer and depends on a sales conversation rather than a trust centre. Budget an extra two to three weeks for that stage, and start early.

Pricing opacity around the free tier. Teamhood’s current page sells one plan with a first month free, while older material still describes a free Personal tier for small teams and Classic tiers for existing customers. Before you plan around a free plan, confirm in writing which line you are being quoted. This is not a criticism of the product; it is a reminder that pricing pages lag pricing changes.

Two smaller ones: EUR-only billing, and support hours that follow a European working day, which matters if your team spans time zones and needs someone on a call at 11pm.

Is per-card time tracking worth the friction?

For a services business, usually yes, and the arithmetic is blunt.

Take eight consultants who each lose 1.5 hours a week to untracked work — the quick call, the small fix, the review nobody put on a card. That is 12 hours a week across the team. Over 46 working weeks, 552 hours. At a €95 billing rate, €52,440 a year of work that was delivered and never invoiced.

You will not recover all of it. Timesheets capture perhaps half before people start resenting the timer, so call it €26,000 recovered against a €1,980 Teamhood bill. Even at a quarter of that, the license is not the cost centre.

Doitify’s counter-argument is not that time tracking is unnecessary; it is that time tracking sits inside a broader performance picture. If you need billable hours attached to cards, both tools do it. If you need billable hours compared against estimates, workload, and project profitability in one report, that is a reporting question and should be evaluated as one.

Which pricing model gets cheaper as you grow?

Growth changes the answer, so run the numbers at your size in eighteen months, not today.

At 40 users, Teamhood annually is 40 × €11 × 12 = €5,280 per year. At 60 users, €7,920. The curve is linear and predictable, which finance likes, and there is no tier cliff to fall off.

Doitify’s package curve depends on members and storage, and the practical question is whether you would otherwise be buying two or three tools to cover the same ground: a board, a document store, and a reporting layer. A 40-person agency on Teamhood plus a separate documentation tool plus a monthly reporting spreadsheet usually finds the combined cost exceeds a single package — but only if the package replaces all three, and only if the team actually uses the reporting.

The mistake at this stage is buying the enterprise tier of anything to solve a 40-person problem. At €11 per user per month, Teamhood is priced so that the escalation is headcount, not tier. Use that.

How do they differ on onboarding and migration?

Teamhood is faster to start, because the board is the product and the board is familiar. A team can be running real work in a day: create columns, set WIP limits, add swimlanes, import cards. The training session is 30 minutes and covers moving a card.

Doitify takes longer, because more of the model is yours to define: projects, owners, statuses, dependencies, and the reporting cadence. That is a 3 to 5 day setup for a 15-person team, with a two-week dip while habits form. The trade is that reporting works from day one of week three instead of being assembled manually forever.

Migration cost in both directions is mostly transcription. Count your open cards: 500 cards at 45 seconds each is 6.25 hours, plus 2 hours rebuilding views. At €45 an hour, €371. Archive anything untouched for 90 days and the number usually halves.

What should you check on security before choosing?

Neither tool should be selected on a features page alone, and both should be asked the same five questions.

Ask for the current SOC 2 Type II report or ISO 27001 certificate and read the scope, not the badge. Ask where data is stored and whether a specific region is contractual. Ask whether single sign-on and SCIM provisioning are included in the plan you are buying or gated to a higher tier. Ask for the audit log sample and the retention policy. Ask what happens to your data on termination, and how the export is delivered.

Doitify’s security page is explicit that its roles, access levels, scoped AI resource access, and board access requests are protection controls, not a compliance certification — treat that as an honest signal and ask for the artifacts you need. Teamhood, as a smaller European vendor, will answer the same questions through its sales process. If a vendor cannot produce a document rather than a paragraph, that is your answer.

Which mistakes make this decision go wrong?

Choosing on the board alone. The board is the most visible surface and the least expensive part of the decision. Reporting, permissions, and export decide whether the tool survives year two.

Assuming a free plan exists because a blog says so. Vendor pricing pages change faster than review sites. Confirm the plan you are budgeting for in writing.

Buying WIP limits you will not enforce. Flow discipline is a management commitment. A board with configured limits and no enforcement is a board with extra settings.

Ignoring the second tool. If you will keep a document store and a reporting export anyway, price the stack, not the seat.

Migrating the archive. Bringing 900 historical cards into a new tool makes it feel slow and cluttered in week one. Archive, then migrate.

Frequently asked questions

Is Doitify cheaper than Teamhood?

At small sizes, Doitify starts at zero for up to 5 members, so it is cheaper until you pass that line. Above it, both are per-member models with different bundling: Teamhood charges €11 per user per month annually for everything it sells, while Doitify’s package is assembled from members, storage, reminders, SMS, pro email, and AI credits.

Does Teamhood have a free plan?

Its current pricing page sells one plan at €11 per user per month with the first month free and no card required. Older material still references a free Personal tier and Classic plans for existing customers, so confirm which line applies to a new account before you plan around free access.

Which tool is better for Kanban teams?

Teamhood, on board mechanics. Enforced WIP limits per column, swimlanes for parallel flows, and capacity tied to the same cards make it the more opinionated and more comfortable board for a strict flow process. Doitify’s board is capable but designed to serve several methodologies at once.

Can we migrate between them easily?

Mostly yes, because both hold tasks with owners and statuses. Budget around 45 seconds per open item plus two hours of view-building, and archive anything untouched for 90 days. Attachments and custom fields are where migrations usually lose fidelity, so check those first.

How long does onboarding take?

Teamhood can be running real work within a day. Doitify takes three to five days for a 15-person team, because projects, owners, statuses, and the reporting cadence are yours to define, with a two-week adjustment period afterwards.

Does Teamhood include timesheets?

Yes. Timesheets, capacity planning, Gantt, and API access are included in its single plan rather than gated behind a higher tier, which is one of the strongest arguments for it in a services business.

Which is better for a bilingual team?

Doitify, if the team writes in Arabic, Hebrew, or Persian daily. It ships RTL support in the interface and the views. Teamhood’s interface is left-to-right, and while the text renders, the layout conventions assume LTR.

Conclusion

Teamhood and Doitify are both good tools aimed at different failures. Teamhood assumes your problem is flow: too much work in progress, unclear capacity, hours that never get billed. It solves that with the best board mechanics in its price band and a single honest plan at €11 per user per month.

Doitify assumes your problem is coordination: many projects, several owners, dependencies, documents, and clients who want a report every month. It solves that by keeping one record and showing it four ways.

Decide by naming the failure you had last quarter. If the answer is “work piled up and nobody could see it,” buy Teamhood. If it is “nobody could tell the client where we were,” buy the wider workspace. And if you cannot name a failure at all, stay on the free tier of either and revisit in a quarter — that is the cheapest decision available.

If this post on Doitify vs Teamhood was helpful, you might also enjoy What Is a RAID Log? (Risks, Assumptions, Issues, Decisions) and How to Prioritize Projects: A Step-by-Step Guide.