Projects fail in the first week, not the last one — usually because nobody formally decided who owns the project, what it is allowed to spend, what counts as success, and who has the authority to say yes. Without that agreement, the project runs on goodwill and improvisation: scope creeps, sponsors micromanage, and the project manager negotiates every resource from scratch. The document that prevents this is the project charter, and it takes about two hours to produce once you have a solid template.
This article gives you a free, copy-paste-ready project charter template, a worked example with real numbers, the sources where you can find more free charter templates, and the mistakes that make charters toothless.
Quick Answer: What Should a Free Project Charter Template Include?
A free project charter template should include these sections: project purpose or justification, high-level objectives and success criteria, key deliverables and high-level requirements, assumptions and constraints, high-level risks, a summary milestone schedule, a summary budget, key stakeholders, and the project manager’s authority and responsibilities — plus a sign-off block. According to the PMBOK guide, the project charter formally authorizes the project, grants the project manager authority to use organizational resources, and is created in the initiating process group.
Why Does a Project Charter Matter So Much?
The charter is the document that converts a project from “an idea someone liked” into “an officially authorized piece of work.” Three things happen the moment a sponsor signs it:
- The project exists officially. Resources, budget, and team time can now be committed to it.
- The project manager has authority. In matrix organizations especially, the charter is what lets a PM ask departments for people and get them.
- The scope has a boundary. The objectives and high-level requirements in the charter become the reference point that scope creep is measured against.
The charter also saves the PM’s job later: when a stakeholder asks for “just one more feature,” the answer is not a personality fight — it is “that is outside the charter’s scope; here is the change control process.” The document, not the person, holds the line.
Join Doitify Today
Move projects forward without the chaos: all your tasks, progress, and team reports in one unified workspace. Built for companies, startups, and remote teams — with a quick setup and a free trial.
The Free Project Charter Template (Copy-Paste Ready)
Copy the structure below into Word, Google Docs, or your project management platform. Keep it to 1–3 pages. Fill every bracket.
1. Charter Header
- Project name: ____
- Project sponsor: ____
- Project manager: ____
- Date: ____ | Version: ____
- Project start date: ____ | Target completion: ____
2. Purpose / Business Justification
Why are we doing this? What problem does it solve or what value does it create? (1–3 sentences: “We are doing X to achieve Y because of Z.”)
3. Objectives and Success Criteria
- Objective 1: ____ | Measurable success: ____
- Objective 2: ____ | Measurable success: ____
- (Keep to 3–5 objectives. Each must be measurable — “increase X by Y%” not “improve X.”)
4. High-Level Scope
- In scope (major deliverables): ____
- Out of scope: ____
- High-level requirements: ____
5. Key Deliverables
- ____
- ____
6. Assumptions and Constraints
- Assumptions: (e.g., “team available at 80% starting week 2,” “vendor contract signed by [date]”)
- Constraints: (fixed budget, fixed deadline, regulatory requirements, limited staff)
7. High-Level Risks
| Risk | Likelihood (L/M/H) | Impact (L/M/H) | Planned response (summary) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ |
8. Summary Milestone Schedule
| Milestone | Target date |
|---|---|
| ____ | ____ |
| ____ | ____ |
9. Summary Budget
- Total budget: ____
- Major cost categories: ____
- Contingency: ____
10. Key Stakeholders
| Stakeholder | Role/interest | Influence (L/M/H) | What they need from the project |
|---|---|---|---|
| ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ |
11. Project Manager Authority and Responsibilities
- Authority: (e.g., “PM may approve task-level changes within baseline; scope/budget/deadline changes require sponsor sign-off.”)
- Responsibilities: ____
12. Sign-Off
- Sponsor signature / date: ____
- Project manager signature / date: ____
- (Add key stakeholders as signatories where the project warrants it.)
Filled-In Example: A Real Project Charter (with numbers)
Here is a condensed filled example — the same website rebuild used across our planning docs, so you can compare the charter with the plan that follows it. This is a 10-week, $35,000 project.
- Purpose: Rebuild the company website and migrate 120 pages to a new CMS to raise demo requests by 20% in six months, replacing a platform that limits conversion and is end-of-life.
- Objectives: 1) Migrate all 120 pages without breaking organic rankings (success: no 404 increase; top 50 keywords hold positions). 2) Launch by the annual conference (success: launch date met). 3) Raise demo requests by 20% within 6 months of launch (success: conversion tracked).
- High-level scope — in: design and build of new site, content migration, SEO redirects, editor training. Out: blog redesign, multilingual versions, live chat, new CRM.
- Deliverables: new homepage and service pages, migrated content, redirect map, training session, launch.
- Assumptions: client content supplied within 5 working days; two developers available from week 2. Constraints: $35,000 budget; launch tied to conference; CMS vendor contract must be signed by week 1.
- High-level risks: content late (H/H) → weekly check-ins and early migration; redirect errors (M/H) → 1:1 redirect map; vendor contract delay (M/M) → legal pre-review.
- Milestones: M1 vendor signed (week 1), M2 design approved (week 3), M3 migration complete (week 7), M4 launch (week 10).
- Budget: $35,000: design $7k, development $14k, content $6k, SEO $4k, QA $2k, contingency $2k.
- Stakeholders: marketing director (sponsor, H), sales VP (needs conversion lift, M), IT (needs security compliance, M).
- PM authority: may adjust task-level execution within baseline; any scope, budget, or deadline change requires sponsor sign-off.
Notice what the charter does that the plan does not: it fixes the authority and the success criteria before any detailed scheduling. The plan (our separate project plan article) fills in the 40 tasks; the charter decides who gets to say yes.
Where Can You Find More Free Project Charter Templates?
Beyond the template above, several reputable sources publish free, professionally written charter templates:
- Smartsheet — free project charter templates in Word, Excel, and Google Docs formats, including simple and detailed versions.
- ProjectManager.com — free charter templates built for Gantt-based planning teams, with all standard sections.
- Atlassian — free project charter templates for Confluence that connect the charter to the rest of the project documentation.
- PMI (Project Management Institute) — published sample charters and the PMBOK guide’s charter definition, useful as reference material.
- Lucidchart — free charter templates that double as visual one-pagers for sponsors.
- Vertex42 / Google Docs templates — classic Word and Google Docs charter templates for simple projects.
Trade-off: a static Word charter is universal and free but becomes a shelf document — it does not connect to tasks, risks, or budget tracking. A tool-native charter (Confluence, a project platform) keeps the signed scope statement linked to the live project, so “is this in scope?” is answered by the working system, not a search for an old file.
How Do You Write and Use a Charter in Practice?
A charter is a two-hour task, not a two-week one. Here is the practical workflow:
- Draft with the sponsor in the room — purpose, scope, success criteria, and budget are decisions, not research. One 60-minute session usually settles them.
- Involve one or two key stakeholders for the scope boundary — the “out of scope” list must be accepted by the people who will try to break it later.
- Keep it high-level on purpose. If you find yourself writing task-level detail, you are writing the plan, not the charter. Push that detail to the plan.
- Get the signature before spending. Team time and money should not flow before the charter authorizes them.
- Use the charter in every governance meeting. When scope changes are proposed, the first question is always: “Inside or outside the charter?”
- Re-charter on major change. If scope, budget, or success criteria shift dramatically, issue a revised charter with fresh sign-off — never let the original become a historical artifact that no longer matches reality.
Scenario 1: 10-week website rebuild (numbers from the example)
At week 6 the sales VP asks for a live chat widget — $6,000 and 2 weeks of work, not in the charter. The PM answers with the charter: out of scope, here is the change control path. The sponsor decides it goes into a phase-2 charter. Without the charter, the PM would have absorbed the request, blown the budget, and missed the launch deadline.
Scenario 2: 6-person product launch, 8 weeks (numbers)
A product launch with a $40,000 budget and 8 weeks to ship. The charter sets success as “GA by [date] with core features only.” Mid-project, engineering proposes two extra features “because they are almost done.” The charter’s scope boundary and milestone schedule settle it: the features wait for a post-launch update. The launch ships on time; the team compares the on-time GA against the contract-win target in the success criteria.
Scenario 3: Internal ERP migration, 20 weeks (numbers)
A 20-week ERP migration with a $250,000 budget across three departments. The charter names each department head a stakeholder and defines PM authority as “task-level changes within baseline.” Week 9: finance wants a different chart of accounts structure — a scope change. Because the charter names finance as a stakeholder with sign-off in the change process, the discussion is structural, not personal, and the revised baseline is approved in a day.
What Are the Common Mistakes When Writing a Project Charter?
Mistake 1: Writing the charter alone and never getting it signed. An unsigned charter is a memo, not authority. The signature is the point.
Mistake 2: Making it a 20-page planning document. The charter is high-level by design. Detail belongs in the project plan. If you cannot read a charter in 10 minutes, it is too long.
Mistake 3: Vague success criteria. “Improve the website” cannot be measured. “Raise demo requests by 20% in 6 months” can. Every objective needs a number or a date.
Mistake 4: No “out of scope” section. Without it, the charter cannot defend the boundary — the most common reason charters fail in practice.
Mistake 5: Skipping risk at the charter level. The project plan lists detailed risks; the charter should still name the 3–5 risks big enough to kill the project, with a response owner.
Mistake 6: Treating the charter as a one-time artifact. Projects change; charters must be revised and re-signed when scope, budget, or success criteria change materially.
Know This Before You Choose
- The charter is a governance tool, not a formality. It exists to give the PM authority and the sponsor a baseline — use it in every scope discussion.
- Two hours is the right budget. Long charters are usually plans wearing a charter costume. Force brevity.
- Success criteria must be measurable. If the sponsor cannot tell you the number, keep asking — the eventual metric is what everyone will be judged against.
- A template cannot save a bad stakeholder session. The template structures the conversation; the sponsor’s decisions fill it. Get the decisions in writing.
- Tool-native charters outlive Word files. A charter stored in the same workspace as the project (linked to tasks, risks, budget) stays connected to execution.
How Can You Keep a Charter Connected to the Project?
A signed charter that lives in a drawer protects nobody. To be transparent: Doitify is our product, which is why we know its capabilities from the inside. In Doitify, a project workspace can hold the charter’s substance — objectives, scope, milestones, budget, risks and constraints, stakeholders, and project documents — alongside the tasks, sub-tasks, and Gantt/board views that execute it. That way the charter is not a detached Word file: when a scope change is proposed, the same workspace shows the milestone schedule, budget, and risk register it affects, and the change decision happens with the full picture visible. If you are currently keeping your charter in one folder and your project in another, moving both into one workspace is the fastest way to make the charter work for you instead of against you.
Conclusion
The project charter is the cheapest insurance a project can buy: a one-to-three-page document, written in an afternoon, signed by the sponsor, that authorizes the project, defines success, draws the scope boundary, and gives the project manager the authority to do the job. Use the free template in this article, keep it short, make the success criteria measurable, and never let it become a shelf document — bring it to every scope and governance discussion. When the plan, the budget, and the charter live in the same workspace as the actual work, the document stops being paperwork and becomes the guardrail that keeps the project on its agreed track.
Join Doitify Today
Move projects forward without the chaos: all your tasks, progress, and team reports in one unified workspace. Built for companies, startups, and remote teams — with a quick setup and a free trial.