Ask any product owner what the biggest problem with their backlog is and you will hear the same thing: it is a long, unordered list of things that might be useful someday, and nobody can tell which item matters most. That is not a product backlog — it is a wishlist. A product backlog template forces order into that chaos by making every item carry the fields that matter: a clear description, acceptance criteria, a priority, an estimate, and a status. Once every item is described the same way, prioritization and sprint planning become decisions instead of arguments.
This article gives you a copy-paste-ready product backlog template, a filled-in example with real numbers, the most practical prioritization methods, the difference between product and sprint backlogs, where to find free templates, and the mistakes that turn a backlog into a graveyard.
Quick Answer: What Should a Product Backlog Template Include?
A product backlog template should include these fields per item: ID, title, user story (or description), acceptance criteria, priority, estimate (story points or T-shirt size), value, dependencies, owner, and status. The two fields that most templates get wrong are priority and estimate — without them you cannot decide what to build next. Per the Scrum Guide, the Product Backlog is an ordered list of everything known to be needed in the product and is never complete; it continuously evolves, so the template’s job is to keep every item comparable so ordering decisions are fast and defensible.
What Is a Product Backlog, Really?
A product backlog is the single ordered list of everything the team might work on to improve the product. The Scrum Guide defines it as an emerging, ordered list of what is needed to improve the product — work that the team is committed to doing in the current sprint is pulled out of the backlog into the sprint backlog, and the remaining items stay ordered by priority.
Three things define a healthy backlog:
- It is ordered, not sorted by accident. The most valuable, most urgent item is on top; the least is at the bottom. Ordering is the Product Owner’s primary responsibility.
- It is never complete. Items are added, removed, split, and rewritten as the product and market change. A backlog that stops changing is a backlog that no longer represents reality.
- It lives at the right level of detail. Top items are small and refined enough to plan; bottom items are bigger, rougher placeholders. One person’s “item” can be a one-day task while another is a quarter-long epic — the template must let you split them.
The template below captures exactly those properties in a table you can copy into a spreadsheet, a board, or a project tool.
همین امروز به دوایتیفای بپیوندید
Move projects forward without the chaos: all your tasks, progress, and team reports in one unified workspace. Built for companies, startups, and remote teams — with a quick setup and a free trial.
The Free Product Backlog Template (Copy-Paste Ready)
Copy the structure below into Excel, Google Sheets, Notion, a board, or your product tool. One row per item, kept in priority order.
Product Backlog Fields (one row per item)
| ID | Title | User story / Description | Acceptance criteria | Priority | Estimate | Value | Dependencies | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PB-01 | ____ | As a ____, I want ____ so that ____. | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ | New / Refined / Ready / Done |
Field guide:
- ID: unique code (PB-01, PB-02) so the team can reference items without repeating titles.
- Title: short, outcome-oriented (“Allow users to reset their password” not “password reset stuff”).
- User story: the standard “As a… I want… so that…” format; use plain description for non-user work (bugs, tech debt).
- Acceptance criteria: the conditions that define done, written as checkable statements.
- Priority: the ordered rank or a category (see prioritization methods below).
- Estimate: story points or T-shirt size (S/M/L/XL).
- Value: why it matters — revenue impact, user pain, risk reduction, strategic fit.
- Dependencies: what must exist first (other items, teams, external vendors).
- Status: New → Refined → Ready (passes Definition of Ready) → Done.
Backlog Header Info
- Product: ____ | Owner (Product Owner): ____
- Refinement cadence: every ____ (e.g., Tuesday, 1 hour)
- Ready threshold (Definition of Ready): acceptance criteria written, estimated, dependencies known, sized small enough for one sprint.
Filled-In Example: A Backlog With Real Numbers
Here is a condensed filled example: a 47-item mobile app backlog for a fitness app, prioritized with MoSCoW.
- MoSCoW split of the 47 items: 8 Must, 15 Should, 19 Could, 5 Won’t (this quarter).
- Top 3 Must items (as filled rows):
- PB-01: Allow users to log a workout offline and sync when back online. Acceptance: workout saves locally, syncs within 30 seconds of reconnection, no data loss. Estimate: 8 points. Dependencies: local DB migration. Status: Ready.
- PB-02: Push notification for daily streak reminders. Acceptance: user gets one reminder/day, opt-in at onboarding. Estimate: 5 points. Dependencies: PB-01. Status: Refined.
- PB-03: Migrate workout history from legacy storage. Acceptance: all 40k historical records migrated with verified counts. Estimate: 13 points. Dependencies: none. Status: New.
- Sprint 1 planning pull: from the Ready items, the team pulled 24 points (PB-01, PB-02, plus two smaller items), leaving the rest ordered.
- Won’t this quarter: gamified badges, social sharing, Apple Watch complication — parked at the bottom with a note to revisit next quarter.
The example shows the three behaviors a healthy backlog needs: top items are Ready (small, estimated, testable), priority is explicit, and bottom items are deliberately deferred rather than silently ignored.
How Do You Prioritize a Product Backlog?
Prioritization is the Product Owner’s job, but the method should be transparent. Four practical methods:
| Method | What it uses | Best for | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoSCoW | Must / Should / Could / Won’t | Simple team-wide sorting, early stages | Crude — no ranking inside each bucket |
| WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First) | (Value + Time criticality + Risk reduction) ÷ Effort | Maximizing delivered value per unit of effort | Heavy on scoring; needs effort estimates |
| RICE | Reach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort | Scoring a mixed list objectively | Confidence scores are still judgments |
| Value vs Effort matrix | Two-axis mapping (value, effort) | Visual fast triage | Subjective axes; tie-breaking is fuzzy |
Practical guidance:
- For a new or small backlog, use MoSCoW. It is fast, understood by everyone, and good enough for 10–40 items.
- For a mature backlog where every item is already “important,” use WSJF or RICE — they produce a defensible numeric order that ends “why is X above Y?” arguments.
- Split anything estimated over one sprint. A 20-point item is not an item; it is a project. Split it until each piece fits one sprint.
- Re-prioritize every refinement session. Priorities are a snapshot, not a contract.
Scenario 1: A 3-person startup building an MVP
The team has a 22-item backlog. The founder uses MoSCoW: 6 Must items for the MVP, 9 Should, 7 Could. The Must items are refined to 1-sprint size, and the MVP is cut to 6 items — the launch ships in 9 weeks instead of the feared 14, because “Could” items were parked instead of half-built.
Scenario 2: A product team with a 60-item backlog fighting over “priority”
The team switches from shouting matches to WSJF. Three items scored: (A) onboarding fix — value 8, urgency 6, risk 5, effort 8 → WSJF 2.4; (B) new export format — value 6, urgency 3, risk 2, effort 5 → WSJF 2.2; (C) dashboard redesign — value 9, urgency 2, risk 1, effort 13 → WSJF 0.9. Item C, previously argued as “top priority,” drops to third, and the team stops relitigating the order at every planning session.
Scenario 3: An e-commerce team drowning in technical debt
Fifty of their 130 backlog items are bugs and tech-debt tickets. They add a “type” field (feature / bug / debt) and a debt ratio target (max 30% of sprint capacity on debt). Within two quarters, the escaped-defect rate drops because debt items are visible, budgeted, and tracked instead of hidden in a pile of “should do.”
Product Backlog vs Sprint Backlog: What’s the Difference?
The product backlog is the full ordered list of everything the product might need — owned by the Product Owner, never complete. The sprint backlog is the small slice of items the team actually commits to during one sprint, pulled from the top of the product backlog at sprint planning. Per the Scrum Guide, the sprint backlog is the set of product backlog items selected for the sprint plus a plan for delivering them. The product backlog can hold 100 items; a healthy sprint backlog holds what the team can finish in 2–4 weeks. The template above is for the product backlog; when you pull items into a sprint, those rows become sprint tasks with owners and daily status.
Where Can You Find Free Product Backlog Templates?
Real, reputable sources include:
- Jira (Atlassian) — the Scrum project template includes a built-in backlog with ordering, estimation, and sprint-planning views; free for small teams. Trade-off: the most complete option, but you live inside the Atlassian stack and the backlog is only as good as the discipline of its users.
- Trello — free backlog board templates that use lists for priority buckets (Next / Soon / Later). Trade-off: simple and visual, but no built-in estimation or acceptance-criteria structure.
- Asana — free product backlog templates with custom fields for priority, estimate, and status. Trade-off: great for tracking, weaker for the ordering ceremony of refinement.
- Notion — flexible product backlog templates with databases, tags, and status properties. Trade-off: you assemble the workflow yourself.
- Dedicated product tools (Productboard, Aha!) — built for roadmap and backlog management with scoring built in. Trade-off: subscription cost and more machinery than a small team needs.
The pattern: spreadsheet and kanban templates are free and universal but static — priorities and estimates live in cells that drift from the actual work. Tool-native backlogs (Jira, Productboard, Asana) keep the backlog connected to sprints, but lock you into that tool’s model. Choose the one whose tracking you will actually maintain.
How Do You Keep a Product Backlog Healthy?
A backlog is a living artifact. The maintenance loop:
- Refine on a fixed cadence — a weekly or biweekly 1-hour session, Product Owner plus the team, focusing on the top 10–15% of items.
- Apply the Definition of Ready — an item is Ready only when acceptance criteria are written, it is estimated, dependencies are known, and it fits one sprint. Nothing else moves into planning.
- Split big items and delete dead ones — if an item has not moved in three quarters, question whether it belongs in the backlog at all.
- Keep the top of the backlog always Ready — so sprint planning never stalls on unrefined items.
- Track the refinement health — a simple signal: how many items entered sprint planning already Ready? If the answer is routinely less than half, the backlog is ahead of the team or the refinement is skipping the wrong items.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: No priority — or priority by recency. An unordered backlog pushes the newest idea to the top. Always rank, and re-rank at every refinement.
Mistake 2: Items that are too big or too vague. A “Redesign the app” item cannot be estimated, planned, or tested. Split it until the pieces fit a sprint and pass the Definition of Ready.
Mistake 3: Confusing product backlog with sprint backlog. Keeping every committed task in the same pile makes it impossible to see what is really committed this sprint.
Mistake 4: A backlog as a permanent wishlist. If nothing is ever deleted or moved to “Won’t”, the list grows until it is unusable. Explicitly deferring items is a feature.
Mistake 5: No estimate on any item. Without estimates you cannot plan capacity, and “quick task” items surprise the team at planning.
Mistake 6: Refinement skipped “because we’re busy.” Skipping refinement moves all the thinking into sprint planning, which then takes twice as long and produces worse commitments.
Know This Before You Choose
- The template’s power is comparability, not storage. Every item described in the same fields is an item you can order and decide on fast.
- Priority and estimate are non-negotiable fields. A backlog without them is a list; a backlog with them is a decision tool.
- Refinement is the real maintenance cost. Budget one hour per week or two hours every two weeks, no matter how big the backlog.
- Bigger is not better. A 30-item healthy backlog beats a 300-item one where nothing is Ready.
- The tool matters less than the ritual. The best template in the world fails without a Product Owner who reorders it and a team that refines it on schedule.
How Can You Run This Template in Doitify?
The step that usually breaks is the handoff from a prioritized spreadsheet to the sprint work the team actually does. To be transparent: Doitify is our product, which is why we know its capabilities from the inside. In Doitify you can keep the product backlog as a real backlog of ordered items with estimates, owners, and checklists, then pull items into sprints with dedicated sprint and backlog views, run the work on Kanban boards, and track dependencies between items so nothing slips because it was blocked silently. Roadmaps, milestones, and work/performance reports keep the Product Owner and stakeholders on the same picture, and reminders and automations handle the refinement cadence. If your backlog is healthy on paper but the sprint handoff keeps breaking, that is exactly the workflow this platform consolidates. Explore project management templates to see the full agile setup in one workspace.
, I want [capability], so that [outcome].” It focuses the item on user value; use plain descriptions for non-user work like bugs and technical debt.|Who owns the product backlog?::The Product Owner owns the backlog and its ordering. The team contributes estimates, refinement, and technical input, but priority decisions belong to the Product Owner.”]
Conclusion
A product backlog template turns a wishlist into a decision tool: every item described the same way, ordered by priority, estimated, and refined to a size the team can actually ship. Copy the template in this article, apply a prioritization method (MoSCoW to start, WSJF or RICE when arguments start), and protect a weekly refinement slot. The team that keeps its backlog top-heavy with Ready, ordered, one-sprint items will find sprint planning getting shorter and commitments getting more honest — and that is the whole reason the backlog exists.
همین امروز به دوایتیفای بپیوندید
Move projects forward without the chaos: all your tasks, progress, and team reports in one unified workspace. Built for companies, startups, and remote teams — with a quick setup and a free trial.